ARCTIC LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND FOREIGN LABOUR MIGRATION IN THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC

Original article

 Download article

 

Maria A. Pitukhina1, Oleg V. Tolstoguzov2, Anastasia D. Belykh3

1, 2, 3Institute of Economics of the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia

1maria.pitukhina@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0001-7012-2079

2olvito@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-4162-8342

3anastasiya.belykh098@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-7361-6696

Abstract. Article deals with sociological survey results of two respondents types (foreign labour migrants and local community) within five Russian Arctic regions (Yamalo-Nenetsky Autonomous District, Chukotksy Autonomous District, Republic of Karelia, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Murmansk Oblast). Survey results of foreign labour migrants made it possible to create a foreign labour migrant profile in the Russian Arctic — it is a man with a secondary vocational education. Survey results of local community in the Russian Arctic made it possible to calculate both conflict index and tolerance index in relation to five Russian Arctic regions. It turned out that conflict index is still quite high at Republic of Karelia and Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). More peaceful situation takes place at Chukotka Autonomous District and Murmanskya Oblast.  Both empirical study and its theoretical generalization revealed foreign labour migrants’ integration issues in the Arctic  as well as what might happen when social climate fluctuates.

The goal of this article is to identify opportunities for cooperation between local communities and foreign labour migrants in the Arctic taking into account socio-economic and ethnic traits of Russian Arctic regions. Based on sociological toolkit identifying some tension areas a theoretical rationale was formulated in order to demonstrate how foreign labour migrants’ integration in the Arctic regions occurs and what might happen when social climate fluctuates. A structural model determining interethnic conflicts likelihood was also applied for predictive evaluation.

In conclusion, it is emphasized that respondents’ survey results hold in five Arctic regions have demonstrated its “preventive” nature for the Arctic. In terms of interethnic relations, Russian Arctic is not tense and is under control.  At the same time, communicative model development between foreign labor migrants and host community allowed  us to see how migrants’ integration occurs in the Arctic and what might happen in social climate under certain fluctuations.

Keywords: Russian Arctic, foreign labour migration, inter-ethnic relations, conflict index, tolerance index, human capital, local communities

Acknowledgments: this work was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Federal Research Centre “Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant  no. 21-18-00500 “Institutional design of single-industry towns in the Arctic zone — modernization and sustainable development”.

For citation: Pitukhina M. A., Tolstoguzov O. V., Belykh A. D. Arctic local communities and foreign labour migration  in the Russian Arctic. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming  the Economic Order], 2022, no. 3, pp. 70–86. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.3.2022.77.005

References

  1. Leksin V., Profiryev B. Socio-economic priorities for the sustainable development of Russian arctic macro-region. Economy of Region, 2017, no. 13 (4), pp. 985–1004. DOI: 10.17059/2017-4-2
  2. Efremova I., Didenko N., Rudenko D., Skripnuk D. Disparities in rural development of the Russian Arctic zone regions. Research for Rural Development, 2017, no. 2, pp. 189–194. DOI: 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.067
  3. Rudenko D., Pogodaeva T., Didenko N. Poverty alleviation strategies in the Russian Arctic zone regions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, no. 6 (1), pp. 32–39. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p32
  4. Heleniak T. Migration in the Arctic. Arctic Yearbook, 2014. Available at: https://arcticyearbook.com/images/yearbook/2014/Scholarly_Papers/4.Heleniak.pdf (accessed 13.01.2022).
  5. Missirian A., Schlenker W. Asylum applications respond to temperature fluctuations. Science, 2017, no. 358 (6370), pp. 1610–1614. DOI: 10.1126/science.aao0432
  6. Solimano A. International Migration in the Age of Crisis and Globalization: Historical and Recent Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2010, p. 240.
  7. Adedeji A. Social Capital and Migrants’ Quality of Life: a Systematic Narrative Review. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2019, no. 22 (1), pp. 87–101.
  8. Lee E. A Theory of Migration. Demography, 1966, no. 3, pp. 47–57.
  9. Zelinsky W. The hypothesis of mobility transition. Geographical Review, 1971, no. 61 (2), pp. 219–249. DOI: 10.2307/213996
  10. Levitt P. Social Remittances: Migration Driven Local-Level Forms of Cultural Diffusion. The International Migration Review, 1998, no. 32 (4), pp. 926–948. DOI: 10.2307/2547666
  11. Mezzadra S. and Neilson B. Between Inclusion and Exclusion: On the Topology of Global Space and Borders. Theory, Culture and Society, 2012, no. 29 (4–5), pp. 58–75. DOI: 10.1177/0263276412443569
  12. Waite L. A place and space for a critical geography of precarity? Geography Compass, 2009, no. 3 (1), pp. 412–433. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00184.x
  13. Castles S. Understanding Global Migration: A Social Transformation Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2010, no. 36 (10), pp. 1565–1586. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2010.489381
  14. Khakhalkina E., Grosheva G. Russian Migration Research in Transnational Discourse: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2019, no. 22, pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.1007/s12134-019-00715-7
  15. Pitukhina M., Tolstoguzov O., Chernyuk I. Russian-Speaking Diaspora in Finland as a Public Diplomacy Tool. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 2019, no. 12 (2), pp. 6–17. DOI:10.24057/2071-9388-2018-31
  16. Filipek K., Polkowska D. The Latent Precariousness of Migrant Workers: a Study of Ukrainians Legally Employed in Poland. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2019, no. 21 (1), pp. 205–220. DOI: 10.1007/s12134-019-00708-6
  17. Duck W. An ethnographic portrait of a precarious life: getting by on even less. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2012, no. 642 (1), pp. 124–138. DOI: 10.1177/0002716212438202
  18. Arthur W. B. Complexity economics: a different framework for economic thought. Santa Fe Working papers, 2013. Available at: https://www.santafe.edu/research/results/working-papers/complexity-economics-a-different-framework-for-eco (accessed 13.01.2022).
  19. Abraham F., Mitina O., Houston D. Chaos theory and the Internet in the postmodern era. Computerra, 2000, 200028, pp. 350–357.
  20. Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, no. 91, pp. 481–510.
  21. Tolstoguzov O., Pitukhina M. Sustainability of social relations: Internal and external factors. Local Politics in a Comparative Perspective, 2017, pp. 89–102. DOI: 10.5771/9783845282213-89
  22. Klimontovich Yu. Turbulent motion and the structure of chaos: A new approach to the statistical theory of open systems. Nauka: 401, 1990.
  23. Iqbal K., Peng H., Hafeez M., KhurshaidAnalyzing the Effect of ICT on Migration and Economic Growth in Belt and Road (BRI) Countries. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2020, no.21 (1), pp. 307–318. DOI: 10.1007/s12134-019-00739-z
  24. Cattell V. Poverty, Community and Health. Co-operation and the Good Society. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, p. 195. DOI: 10.1057/9780230355101
  25. Pan J. Predictors of post-migration growth for Chinese international students in Australia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2015, no. 47, pp. 69–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.030
  26. Waite C., Smith D. Temporary skilled international migration of young professional cricketers: ‘Going Down-Under’ to move-up the career path. Geoforum, 2017, no. 84, pp. 70–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.004
  27. Arevalo S., Tucker K., Falcon L. Beyond Cultural Factors to Understand Immigrant Mental Health: Neighborhood Ethnic Density and the Moderating Role of Pre-migration and Post-migration Factors. Social Science & Medicine, 2015, no. 138, pp. 91–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.040
  28. Li S., Liddel B., Nickerson A. The relationship between post-migration stress and psychological disorders in refugees and asylum seekers. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2016, no. 18 (9), pp. 82. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-016-0723-0
  29. Norris A., Arojan K., Nickerson D. Pre-migration persecution, post-migration stressors and resources, and post-migration mental health: a study of severely traumatized U. S. Arab immigrant women. Journal of American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 2011, no. 17 (4), pp. 283–296. DOI: 10.1177/1078390311408900
  30. Germashev I., Derbisher E., Derbisher V., Kulikova N. Convergence of series of fuzzy numbers with a unimodal membership function. Mathematical Physics and Computer Modeling, 2018, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 11–16. DOI: 10.15688/mpcm.jvolsu.2018.1.2