INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF TAX REGULATION OF ARCTIC OIL AND GAS PROJECTS

Original article

 Download article 

Mеdeya V. Ivanova

Luzin Institute for Economic Studies, Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia mv.ivanova@ksc.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-6091-8804

Abstract. The article presents the issues of tax regulation connected to the implementation of oil and gas projects in the Arctic region of Russia. Over the past decades, revenue from oil and gas have dominated the state budget and, as a following, the country’s economy. Fiscal policy has evidently become one of the main regulators of support and development of this industry. Currently, the mineral extraction tax, export duty and additional income tax have become the main types of payments for the use of subsoil. Current trends of exploration and development of deposits have shifted towards the seas and oceans of the Arctic basin and facing new technical and legislative challenges. Significant differences in the conditions for the development of “Arctic” and “traditional” fields require a differentiated approach to tax regulation, in order to stimulate investment activity in the Arctic and improve the efficiency of oil and gas projects in the region. The study is built on elements of a functionalist institutional approach to the formation of tax relations and regulations between the state and businesses, representing the main Arctic players. The functionalist approach assumes that institutions reflect the interests of their creators. Any change in interests or conditions leads to the transformation of the institution, as evidenced by the permanent change in the rules of tax regulation in the fields of production and realization of oil and gas products. The purpose of the study was to monitor the tax regulation related to the development of the oil and gas business in the Arctic, which ensures the formation of a cargo base and an increase in the load on the Northern Sea Route. The first part of the study is devoted to the definition of special conditions for the implementation of projects in the Arctic region which determine the need for special tax regulation. The second part of the discussion considers the transformation of tax regulation of Arctic oil and gas projects in terms of mineral extraction tax and export duty. The study allows us to conclude that the state, being one of the key stakeholders, introduces tax incentives and creates favorable conditions for companies, taking on the risks of losing tax revenue. However, this approach opens up access to the oil and gas reserves of the Arctic region, the extraction of which was previously economically inefficient.

Keywords: region, Arctic, taxes, oil and gas business, Northern Sea Route

Acknowledgments: the publication is based on the results of the state assignment on the topic of the research of the Lusin Institute for Economic Studies of the Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Science work АААА-А18-118051590119-7 “Scientific and applied foundations for sustainable development and modernization of maritime activities in the Western part of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation”.

For citation: Ivanova M. V. Institutional aspects of tax regulation of Arctic oil and gas projects. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka [The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order], 2022, no. 2, pp. 97–106. doi:10.37614/2220-802X.2.2022.76.008

References

  1. Fadeev A. M., Cherepovicyn A. E., Larichkin F. D. Strategicheskoe upravlenie neftegazovym kompleksom v Arktike [Strategic management of the oil and gas complex in the Arctic]. Apatity, KNC RAN, 2019, 291 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Ivanova M. V., Koz’menko A. S Spatial management of the shipping routes in the Russian Arctic // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2021, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 92–104.
  3. Krugman P. Prostranstvo: poslednij rubezh [Space: The Last Frontier]. Prostranstvennaya ekonomika [Spatial Economics], 2005, no. 3, pp. 121–136. (In Russ.).
  4. Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A-J. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2001, pp. 384–402.
  5. North D. C. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97–112.
  6. Williamson O. E. Transaction Cost Economics: How it Works; Where It Is Headed. De Economist, 1998, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 23–58.
  7. Knigt J. Institution and Social Conflict. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  8. Karagianni S., Pempetzoglou M., Saraidaris A. Tax burden distribution and GDP growth: Non-linear causality considerations in the USA, International Review of Economics and Finance, 2012, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 186–194. DOI: 1016/j.iref.2011.06.002
  9. Swift, Zhicheng Li. Managing the Effects of Tax Expenditures on National Budgets. Policy Research Working Paper, 2006, no. 3927.
  10. Pilyasov A. N. Smelost xozyajstvennyx reshenij I sovremennoe osvoenie rossijskoj Arktiki [Courage in economic decisions and modern development of the Russian Arctic]. Arktika i Sever [The Arctic and The North], 2020, 40, pp. 82–106. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.40.82. (In Russ.).
  11. Pilyasov A. N. Putilova E. S. Novye proekty osvoeniya rossijskoj Arktiki prostranstvo znachimo! [New projects for the development of the Russian Arctic: space matters!]. Arktika i Sever [The Arctic and The North], 2020, 38, pp. 21–43. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.38.21. (In Russ.).
  12. Kontorovich A. E. Globalnye problem nefti i gaza I novaya paradigma razvitiya neftegazovogo kompleksa Rossii [Global problems of oil and gas and a new paradigm for the development of the Russian oil and gas complex]. Nauka iz pervyh ruk [Science first hand], 2016, no. 1, pp. 6–17. (In Russ.).
  13. Sochneva I. O. Resursy Arktiki i vozmozhnosti ih razrabotki [Resources of the Arctic and the possibility of their development]. Arktika ekologiya i ekonomika [The Arctic: Ecology and Economics], 2015, vol. 20, no. 4. pp. 70–77. (In Russ.).
  14. Mirzoev D.A. Ibragimov I.E. Arxipova O. Innovacionnye tehnologi i podvodnoj dobychi uglevodorodov na shelfe Arktiki [Innovative technologies for underwater hydrocarbon production on the Arctic shelf]. RU [Neftegaz.RU], 2012, no. 8, pp. 44–47. (In Russ.).
  15. Ilinskij A. A. Prishhepa O. M. Novye formy organizacionnogo vzaimodejstviya pri reshenii zadach geologicheskogo izucheniya i osvoeniya netradicionnyh i trudno izvlekaemyx zapasov [New forms of organizational interaction in solving problems of geological study and development of unconventional and hard-to-recover reserves]. Geologiya nefti I gaza [Geology of oil and gas], 2017, no. 3, pp. 77–83. (In Russ.).
  16. Globalnye tendenci I osvoeniya energeticheskih resursov Rossijskoj Arktiki. Ch. II Monitoring osvoeniya arkticheskih energeticheskih resursov [Global trends in the development of energy resources in the Russian Arctic. Part II Monitoring the development of Arctic energy resources]. Apatity, KSC RAS, 2019, pp. 170. (In Russ.).
  17. Filimonova I. V. Nemov V. Yu. Provornaya I. V. Mishenin M. V Regionalnye osobennosti dobychi I pererabotki nefti v Rossii [Regional features of oil production and refining in Russia]. Burenie i neft [Drilling and oil], 2020, no. 10, pp. 3–10. (In Russ.).
  18. Drielsma, Johannes & Allington, Ruth & Brady, Thomas & Guinée, Jeroen & Hammarstrom, Jane & Hummen, Torsten & Russell-Vaccari, Andrea & Schneider, Laura & Sonnemann, Guido & Weihed, Pär. (2016). Abiotic Raw Materials in Life Cycle Impact Assessments: An Emerging Consensus across Disciplines. Resources. 5. 10.3390/resources5010012.
  19. Mary M. Poulton, Sverker C. Jagers, Stefan Linde, Dirk Van Zyl,4 Luke J. Danielson, and Simon Matti. State of the World’s Nonfuel Mineral Resources: Supply, Demand, and Socio-Institutional Fundamentals. Annual Review of Environmental and Resources, vol. 38, 2013, pp. 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-022310-094734
  20. Gromov A. I. Perspektivy razvitiya rossijskoj neftyanoj otrasli v usloviyah turbulentnosti na mirovom neftyanom rynke [Prospects for the development of the Russian oil industry in conditions of turbulence in the global oil market]. Burenie I neft [Drilling and oil], 2016, no. 2, pp. 6–10. (In Russ.).
  21. Novak A. Okno vozmozhnostej dlya Rossii [Window of opportunity for Russia]. Neftegazovaya vertical [Oil and gas vertical], 2018, no. 1, pp. 20–26. (In Russ.).
  22. Cherkasova E. I. Mullaxmetova L. I. Xvorova E. V. Gosudarstvennoe nalogovoe regulirovanie v neftegazovom komplekse [State tax regulation in the oil and gas complex]. Vestnik VGUIT [Bulletin of VSUIT], 2018, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 348–356. DOI: 10.20914/2310-1202-2018-1-348-356. (In Russ.).